Trust & transparency
Editorial & Medical Review Policy
Everything we publish is written to be useful before it is persuasive. This page explains who writes our content, who checks it, how often it is re-checked, and what we do when we get something wrong.
Evidence first
Every article is built from independent public-health guidance and peer-reviewed research. We cite the source rather than paraphrase it, and links open directly to the original publication.
Reviewed by a clinician
Content is checked by Prof MM Althaf, MD, FRCP(UK), FASN, MSc. before publication. The reviewer checks accuracy, safety information and the way risks are described.
Claims kept within EU law
We only present a health benefit where an authorised claim exists for that nutrient at the level supplied. Where no authorised claim exists, we describe the ingredient and its traditional use plainly, without implying an effect.
Reviewed on a schedule
Articles carry the date they were last reviewed and are re-checked at least every 12 months, or sooner when guidance changes.
Commercial independence
Our editorial team writes independently of the commercial team. Products are mentioned where they are genuinely relevant to the topic, and a product mention never changes what the evidence section says.
Corrections
If something is wrong, tell us and we will correct it. Substantive corrections update the review date shown on the article.
Our medical reviewer
Prof MM Althaf, MD, FRCP(UK), FASN, MSc. reviews our nutrition and supplement content for factual accuracy, safety information and appropriate framing of risk. You can read more about our expert panel on the experts page.
Request a correction
Email hello@vitaminvitality.co.uk with the article link and what you believe is inaccurate. We aim to respond within five working days.
Our content is for general information only. It is not medical advice and does not replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional.